According to the owners of the company, Tsfasman's activities led to losses in the project, which were covered by a decision to increase the authorized capital by means of contributions from participants, as a result of which her share was reduced to a negligible level.
According to the Managing Partner of RussianLegal, the example of Tsfasman shows the classic techniques of corporate warfare, when the holders of qualified majority, using legal tools, squeeze out partners.
Read more in the Forbes investigation here.
