Group structure
Before the conflict began
During the conflict
The essence of the conflict
The CEO of the client's subsidiary in Russia colluded with a number of other top managers and, under the guise of making ordinary deals, withdrew funds from the company to his parallel business.
At the same time, the director (opponent) initiated bankruptcy of one of such counterparties and provoked a threat of subsidiary responsibility of the client by claiming that this counterparty (parallel business) was allegedly also controlled by the EU client.
The Law Office Actions
The following actions were taken in the course of the Law Office's conflict:
1.
A lawsuit was filed to recover multimillion-dollar damages from the opponent. The lawsuit was won in all judicial instance;
2.
Disclosed all corporate schemes of the opponents, proved the legal and factual connection of the opponent with the parallel business;
3.
Protected the client's interests in bankruptcy proceedings and eliminated the threat of bringing the client to subsidiary responsibility.
Result
1.
The conflict was settled by amicable settlement
2.
Bankruptcy proceedings were terminated and the threat of subsidiary responsibility was eliminated
3.
The business has been saved
